Let's sort this out

Should there be one law for the Prime Minister and his entourage and one for everyone else?
Yes.

Why?
Because it's what the country needs. No-one expects them to obey the law the way we do anyway. Let's be honest.

Why should we be honest, when the Prime Minister and his entourage aren't?
Because they don't have to be honest.

Why don't they have to be honest?
Because they won the election.

And that gives them the right to be dishonest, does it?
Yes. [Pause]

Oh! Okay. Just thought I'd ask.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's get on board

8th August, 2020 Once again we face a high summer of inflatables, awash to the gunwales with refugees, trying desperately and at the risk of their lives, to get to Britain.  Here, in the country itself, everyone is exhausted by Covid-19. No-one wants to talk about it. It's all been said anyway. And if it hasn't, no-one wants to hear it. Pretty much the same can be said about Brexit, politics generally, the economy, government, and so on. No-one wants to know any more. We are hunkering down inside our castles, pulling up the drawbridge and sitting down in front of our televisions and drinking beer from the bottle. Our bellies increase as our bank accounts decrease. But we can't be bothered to deal with it. It is mercilessly hot. We have all the curtains closed to shut out the appalling heat. We slurp in a sweaty lassitude drinking cold things hoping this will change everything: Covid, the refugee problem, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, China, USA, the murder of the innocent everywher...
Read more

So long, and thanks for all the fish

The Douglas Adams headline is a thank you to him for making me laugh over the years, and as good a way of saying goodbye to the watching world as I can think of, especially given the fact that no-one is watching at all. I promised myself that I would continue it until the last desperate reader had at last been shaken off by my prose or ideas or both. No-one has read this blog for a week or so, and thus the moment has come to disappear gracefully from the stage. What a relief I don't hear you say. You might like to not know that there were a total of 538 reads of the posts, the vast majority from the UK (421), 63 from Portugal, 23 from Canada, 9 from Germany, 8 from Ireland, 5 from South Korea, 2 from Belgium, 2 from France, 2 from the United States of America, 2 from an unknown region, and 1 from the Netherlands. I only told three people about it, so where they all came from I don't know. The dogged loyalty of the Portuguese reader in particular is quite amazing. To him or her ...
Read more

Until November

12 August 2020 And there you go! Right on the button! Exactly on time! Precisely as predicted! In my last blog entry I speculated that my use of the word 'assassination' triggered an algorythmic search in America. I'd only used it once, and the next day I had my first and only reader in the USA. I felt these events were obviously connected, but I couldn't be sure, so I thought I'd try an experiment. I used the word five time in Monday's piece. Today I checked the analytics for the countries where readers had read my blog, and sure enough, there is the USA. A single reader. One hit. So twice I have had a single reader in the USA, and on both occasions the day after I used the word 'assassination'. And I am betting that because I have used it here, I will have a single solitary reader in the USA tomorrow or Friday. Twice might be a co-incidence. Three times wouldn't be. Well that's that sorted. It's so good to know we are being kept safe for de...
Read more