How much do you know about viruses?

We have been living in closer contact with viruses for longer than any of us really enjoy. You should know a lot about them by now. This is a short quiz designed to test your knowledge about viruses. Give yourselves marks (not masks) out of ten after comparing your answers with the real ones at the bottom of the page. You can use a protractor, dividers, a pair of compasses, a slide rule, an electronic calculator, deep blue, an astrolabe, an orrery, a sextant, an interdental harp and a partridge in a pear tree. You have three hours to complete your paper and five minutes to eat it. Good luck.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1) What is a virus?

2) Are viruses alive?

3) How do we know?

4) We know that virusus need a host. Is it Ant or Dec?

5) What's the difference between a virus and a coronavirus?

6) Why corona?

7) Where do viruses come from? What is their origin?

8) Are viruses, like politicians, essentially parasitic?

9) How big is a virus? Describe your answer using a protractor, dividers, a pair of compasses, a slide rule, an electronic calculator, deep blue, an astrolabe, an orrery, a sextant, an interdental harp and a partridge in a pear tree.

10) When will they announce a vaccine for the common cold. That's a virus, isn't it?

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

1) Science doesn't yet know the answer to this one
2) Science doesn't yet know the answer to this one
3) Science doesn't yet
4) Neither or both. Science doesn't yet know.
5) Science doesn't yet know
6) Why not?
7) Science doesn't yet know the answer to this one
8) Maybe, but science cannot be sure. It's sure about politicians, but not viruses.
9) It depends.
10) Yes, it is a virus, and science doesn't know when.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's get on board

8th August, 2020 Once again we face a high summer of inflatables, awash to the gunwales with refugees, trying desperately and at the risk of their lives, to get to Britain.  Here, in the country itself, everyone is exhausted by Covid-19. No-one wants to talk about it. It's all been said anyway. And if it hasn't, no-one wants to hear it. Pretty much the same can be said about Brexit, politics generally, the economy, government, and so on. No-one wants to know any more. We are hunkering down inside our castles, pulling up the drawbridge and sitting down in front of our televisions and drinking beer from the bottle. Our bellies increase as our bank accounts decrease. But we can't be bothered to deal with it. It is mercilessly hot. We have all the curtains closed to shut out the appalling heat. We slurp in a sweaty lassitude drinking cold things hoping this will change everything: Covid, the refugee problem, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, China, USA, the murder of the innocent everywher...
Read more

So long, and thanks for all the fish

The Douglas Adams headline is a thank you to him for making me laugh over the years, and as good a way of saying goodbye to the watching world as I can think of, especially given the fact that no-one is watching at all. I promised myself that I would continue it until the last desperate reader had at last been shaken off by my prose or ideas or both. No-one has read this blog for a week or so, and thus the moment has come to disappear gracefully from the stage. What a relief I don't hear you say. You might like to not know that there were a total of 538 reads of the posts, the vast majority from the UK (421), 63 from Portugal, 23 from Canada, 9 from Germany, 8 from Ireland, 5 from South Korea, 2 from Belgium, 2 from France, 2 from the United States of America, 2 from an unknown region, and 1 from the Netherlands. I only told three people about it, so where they all came from I don't know. The dogged loyalty of the Portuguese reader in particular is quite amazing. To him or her ...
Read more

Until November

12 August 2020 And there you go! Right on the button! Exactly on time! Precisely as predicted! In my last blog entry I speculated that my use of the word 'assassination' triggered an algorythmic search in America. I'd only used it once, and the next day I had my first and only reader in the USA. I felt these events were obviously connected, but I couldn't be sure, so I thought I'd try an experiment. I used the word five time in Monday's piece. Today I checked the analytics for the countries where readers had read my blog, and sure enough, there is the USA. A single reader. One hit. So twice I have had a single reader in the USA, and on both occasions the day after I used the word 'assassination'. And I am betting that because I have used it here, I will have a single solitary reader in the USA tomorrow or Friday. Twice might be a co-incidence. Three times wouldn't be. Well that's that sorted. It's so good to know we are being kept safe for de...
Read more